ABSTRACTS
Sharia, Expediency and Rule; a Survey of the Islamic Republic’s
Potentialities in the Management of Structural Challenges
Dr. Asqar
Eftekhari
A common
unfavorable condition in the third world is that a lot of political
systems, by being extremely committed to security and stability purposes,
are unable to let in any structural change and consequently create an
unflexible form that won’t accept the peripheral demands or respond
appropriately to them. On this permise a lot of critics considered the
Islamic Republic of Iran as a defeated endeavor and assumed that it
would decline very soon due to its internal conflicts. But in practice one
could see the contrary since from the very start the Islamic Republic
experienced various structural changes that few third world countries had
witnessed. Among these one can refer to the Expedirncy Council as an
important institution that has played efficient roles in the path of
national purposes.
In this article
the writer adopts the theoretical framework of Huntington’s “Institutional
development” and Parson’s “dynamic constancy”, and discusses the formation,
development and continuation of the activity of the Expediency Council as a
structural experience in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Key
expressions: dynamic constancy – institutionalism – Expediency council – shiite
political expediency.
The Status of People in the Thought and Political Practice of Shiite Ulamas
from “Tanbakoo” Movement to the Islamic Revolution (A case study of
Ayatollahs Mirzaye Shirazi, Naeeni, Modarress and Imam Khomeini)
Dr. Nasser
Jamalzadeh
The article
shows that the more we proceed from the eras of Tanbakoo and Mashrootyat
movements to the Islamic Revolution, the more we can see a reliance on the
role of people in government in the political thought of Ulamas (or Islamic
jurisprudents). They consequently request a more participation of people in
shaping governments and because of their high status as religious and
spiritual leaders they are easily heeded by the masses to the extent that
one could obviously see the latter’s taking part in determining their fate .
The ultimate condition exists in the post-Islamic Revolution era when
people’s political participation in forming governments has become
institutionalized and shows itself as a right and, even more, as a duty.
Key
expressions:
People-Shiite Ulamas, Majlis(The parliament), political participation,
Ulamas’political thought, Mirzaye Shirazi, Naeeni, Modarress, Imam Khomeini.
Democracy; A Survey of one Theory in Two Legal Systems
Dr. Mohsen Esmaeeli
Democracy is a
controversial concept in law and political philosophy. Its attractiveness in
different countries gives rise to a fundamental question: Can it be
internalized in each culture on the basis of native values or it is to be
considered as a monolithic theory that demands either a total submission or
rejection. In our country the first question to be asked was about the way
republicanism and Islamism were to be combined. It was then ensued by the
theory of “religious democracy”. Meanwhile there have been some who have
definitely rejected this relationship by branding it as a sort of heresy.
The present article tries to make a survey of the origins and consequences
of democratic theory in the west, and to prove the fact that according to
the Islamic Republic of Iran’s constitution, the system has been approved as
a method of managing the community but disapproved as a worldview.
Key
expressions: democracy – republicanism – the Declaration of Guman Rights –
Constitution – religious democracy.
The Islamic Foundations of the Sovereignty Right of the People in the
Constitution of the Islamic Republic
Dr. Ali
Sabbaghian
The positive
consequence of the Islamic Revolution is the establishment of the Islamic
Republic of Iran which is in its turn epitomized in its Constitution. This
has sanctioned people’s sovereignty as the cause and origin of the
government’s power. Since the designers of the Constitution were mostly from
among Islamic jurisprudents, the foundations of the sovereignty right of the
people were indispensably rooted in religious doctrines. This article
intends to demonstrate those doctrines that were of major concern for the
designers of the Constitution.
Key
expressions:
The Constitution, people’s sovreignty right , Man as a representation
of God on Earth, the dignity of man, equality, liberty, consultation,
rejection of dictatorship , enjoining the virtuous and prohibiting evil
acts.
The Islamic Republic and Shiite Political Thought Challenges
Dr. Ali
Akbar Kamali Ardakani
The political
thought among moslems whether shiites or sunnis remained stagnant until
recent decades, hence speculations about an “Islamic Government” is a new
phenomenon in the field of political and jurisprudential shiite thought that
has occurred after the victory of the Islamic Revolution. This has resulted,
in numerous challenges. One should notice that shiite political thought is a
scattered combination of different jurisprudential, theological, and
philosophical discussions, all far apart from the modern political thought.
The shiite scholars are teying to present their speculation in this regard
based on one of the given approaches, but the substantical differences that
exist makes them offer widely different responses about the most appropriate
government.
Key
expressions: Political thought – Islamic government – shiite – political
jurisprudence – political philosophy.
The Universality of Liberalism and the Paradox of the Islamic Republic of
Iran.
Dr. Farshad
Shariat
The article
demonstrates the interaction between republicanism and Islamism as the major
political doctrine in the Islamic Revolution and its confrontation with the
universalization of liberalism.
It centers on
detecting the true nature of liberalism and analyzing the instruments
adopted by the Islamic Republic in its attempt to achieve both conditions
simultaneously. It then shows the way the Islamic Republic has taken
independent steps in the process of modern civilization.
Key
expressions: Liberalism – Republicanism – Islamism – Universaliztion – The Islamic
Republic.
The Ethical Foundations of the Islamic Republic of Iran Towards its
Opponents, a case study
Dr.Ali Akbar
Alikhani
The article is
based on the assumption that religious governments in general and Islamic
governments including the Islamic Republic of Iran in particular, should be
committed to ethical norms in the field of politics, since ethics is an
inseparable part of divine revelations. One challenging task of every regime
is how to deal with its political opponents, hence, the significance of
commitment to ethics.
The article
demonstrates Imam Ali’s moralistic political stance towards his opponents in
six parts and compares it with the Constitution of the Islamic Republic.
Reference to Imam Ali is because of the fact that IRI as a Shiite regime
feels itself bound to follow his path as an ultimate model.
Key
expressions:
Islamic Republic – ethics, politics – Imam Ali – political
opponents – Islamic political thought.
The Legitimacy of the Rule of Impeccable Imams and that of the Islamic
Jurisprudents according to Shahid Motahhari
Maghsood
Ranjbar
Ligitimacy is a
major theme discussed in political philosophy . In this article there is a
quick survery of this concept and various Islamic viewpoints about the basis
of political legitimacy together with an elaboration on Shahid Motahhari’s
view about the legitimacy of an Islamic government. The essence of the
latter’s view is a distinction between this kind of rule during Impeccable
Imams’ presence and during their absence . He further maintains that in the
first instance the legitimacy of the rule is divine whereas in the second
condition it is democratic .
Key
expressions:
legitimacy, Imam , political leadership , the leadership of the supreme
jurisprudent (Velayat-e-Faghih)
The Correlative Reasons in Islamism and Secularism
Morteza
Bahrani
A major issue
in the discourses pertaining to Islamism and Secularism is the method of
reasoning in each. The reasons offered are typically of three kinds :
rational, devotional and historical . Both groups have recourse to
these three methods very seriously . These methods have been used both
positively to confirm the claims of each side and negatively to contradict
those of the opponent. A study of certain examples of those reasonings and
heir categorization into rational, devotional and historical kinds reveals
the similarity of the premises on both sides . In other words none of the
claims has superiority to the other as far as the kind of reasoning is
concerned . It’s only through a multilateral and interdisciplinary study
that one may detect sufficiency , contradiction or superiority in those
reasonings.
Key
expressions:
religion, politics, Islamism, secularism. epistemology.