In recent age, as a result of declining power of family, and the frailty of parent's supervision on their children and their adolescents and much more freedom that, properly or improperly, is provided for them, also as a result of increasingly ytilizing of bicycle and other dangerous things which may cause detriment to others and also as a consequence of development of mental problems, compensation for damage which arise from injurious actions of interdicted people is attracting the attention of law scholars and this has added up to the importance of the subjects. The civil responsibility of harmful action, in general and civil responsibility of injurious action of interdicted people in particular, has always been regarded. It has had basic chanfe in history. Different ideas have also been mentioned in this field. The law of Iran has adopted a particular way and it has different regulations. What is attempted by this thesis is to prove, firstly that considering the rich Islamic jurisprudence on civil responsibility especially the interdicted, there is no need to resort to the Eutopean theories on civil responsibility. Secondly, justice and equity demand that the loss caused by interdicted person can be compensated and there shouldn't be any loss without compensation. Thirdly, the title "ODWAN" in jurisprudence and fault (tort) in civil law is merely to obtaion causative relation not the basis of civil responsibility.