FTP        E-Mail      Back

Majid Motazedi

 

Up
ABD-AL-KHALEGH  ABBASPOUR
Ali Mahboubi
Morteza Naeemi
M.Hadi Ghabooli Dorafshan
G.Ali Mirzaie Monfared
Reza Faani
Nematollah Yadollahi
Majid Motazedi
Akbar Barzegar Samgh Abadi
Mohammad Sharif Hodgati
Ali behnam
Mahmood Ahmadi
Mostafa  Katebi
Ali reza Alipanah
Ahmad Motevalli Alamouti
Hassan Fadai
Majid Sarbazian Esfandabad
Rouhollah Reazai
Ali Akbar  Hatefi
ALI MOHSENIYAN
Javad Hazeri
Ali Tofighi Naeem
Dariush Hosseini
Hassan Fartousi
Mojtaba Movahedi Maram
Hossein  Heydari Monavvar
Aboozar Behroozi
Jafar Asgari
Vahid Dashti
Ali TAHVILIAN
Ghasem kamyab Chenari
Ali Khazaei
Roohollah Khalil Khalily
Ali Nazari Montazer
Mohammad Reza Rahmat
Mahdi Esmaili
Hassan Ghasemi Moghadam
Hossein abedini
Hossein Ghorbanzadeh
Shahid Shateripour Esfahani
Vahid Yaminpur
ROUHALLAH SEPEHRI
Morteza Mashhadizade
Amin Fattah
Shahram rahmani
Hassan Sadegh Zadeh Ghamsary
Mohammad Masumi

Thesis Code:

L. 308

Author (s):

Majid Motazedi

Title:

A Research on the Approaches of the Quran and Classical Criminal Law to Punishment

Supervisor (s):

Mehdi Hadavi Tehrani

Advisor (s):

Gholamhossein Elham

Thesis:

M. A. Law

Date of Print:

Winter 2006

University:

IMAM SADIQ (AS)

College:

Islamic Studies and Law

Abstract:

In the field of penalty , the criminal policy predominated  over the judicial systems of different countries, is based on viewpoints that nowadays in the classical criminal law are classified into three general approaches ,  "consequential" , "retributional" and "mixed or middle" . In justifying punishment, the "consequential" theory emphasizes  its results and benefits, and therefore has a forward_looking view. On the contrary the "retributive" theory believes that the legitimacy of punishment , irrespective of its results , is justified for the commitment of crime in the past , and hence has a backward-looking view . Also some thinkers by mixing the elements of these two theories are trying to present a theory  which considers both aspects mentioned.

The judicial system of our country, as an Islamic country, should be based upon Islamic criminal principles . Hence , a recourse to the Quran as the most important source of revelation in Islam , and a search for the essential questions concerned with the issue of punishment , as of nature , aim , quality and quantity of punishment in the Quran is necessary . Of course the purport of punishment in the Quran , beyond the written and formal punishment , contains the whole kinds of punishment , including written punishment , natural informal and unwritten punishment , unnatural informal and unwritten punishment , and also punishment concerned with afterlife . And punishments are not considered just as the executive guarantee of establishing safe relations between God and human beings . Considering the fact that human beings are endowed with authority and free will , the Quran emphasizes much on the aim of retribution ; an aim which has been overshadowed in the criminal policy of classical judicial systems by other correctional and reformative goals .

After the examination of historical changes and variations over punishment as the continuation of the classical criminal law , this thesis aims to deal with the meaning of punishment and the essential questions concerned with it into the classical criminal system , and then by comparing and searching these issues in the Quran , to attain finally the Quranic idea about punishment .

 

Key Words

Crime , Criminal , Punishment , Authority , Consequential , Retributional , Formal & Written , Natural  informal & Unwritten , Unnatural informal & Unwritten Punishments , Punishments concerned with afterlife .

 

Updated  May. 2011

Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran(IR).  P.O.Box: 14655-159. Tel: +98 21 88094001, Fax: +98 21 88093484.  Email: isu@isu.ac.ir

Copyright © Mar 2005 Web Master of ISU