FTP        E-Mail      Back

Morteza Hooshyar

Up
Hashemian, Seyyed Mansoor
MEHDIZADEH, MEHDI
Koosha, Saeid
Sarafrz Ardakani, Habib
Mlahdi Panah, Massod
Hazrati, Abolfazl
Korani, Mohammad
Tavakoli, Reza
Hooshyar, Morteza
jabbari, jalil
Maick Afzaly, Mojtaba
Moosavinia, Hamed
MASSAH, HOSSEIN
Toghraneghar, Hassan
Dabiri, Mohammad Sadegh

Thesis Code:

L. 179

Author (s):

Morteza Hooshyar

Title:

Begining to Crim  in IranianCriminal Law and Shiah Jurisprudance

Supervisor (s):

Dr. J. Coosha

Advisor (s):

Dr. M. A. Mahdawy Thabet

Thesis:

M.A. Law

Date of Print:

Autumn  2000

University:

IMAM SADIQ (AS)

College:

 Islamic Studies and Law

Abstract:

One of the important subjects of the General law Punishment is so bigining thecrime. bigining the crime at the first time was seriously set forth by the Italian lawyers atseventeenth century. This matter after that was disscussed ....... consequently by theother lowyers ....... and ....... during the last three century this matter involved thetremendous changes and was compaying considering the Doctorian, ....... the remarkableflourishing and muturity.

The Iranian legislatorsalso because of the importance of the matter of bigining thecrime, with modeling of the penal Regulations collection of the France, year 1810(Napelion code), for the first time, has included the mentioned legal stablishmentofficially into the Iranian legal system and since now has the Remarkable and seriousprecence at the Iranian law system regarding the variaus changes the importance ofmentioned subject is so much that some of the Islamic lawyers had payd attention tosurvey and comparison of this matter at the subjected law system and Islamic laws.

The other important issue is that, the Iranian lawyers has comfirmed the legalestablishment of begining of crime, after the Islamic Revoloution and has allocated thenumerousmatters in this regard while we know that the Iranian legislators has attemptedto accept the legal constructions, Regarding the Religious concepts and basis facts, weshould findout the Religious basis of the bigining the crime, with more precision andconsideration concerning finding the instead of bigining the crime, we must say that theviewpoint of the Islamic and classic regarding the crime lawyers is the completecomparison of mentioned consepts at the otherhand the Islamic and classic lawyersbelieved that the ....... of the same crime is impossible, regarding the common points ofthese two concepts but regarding the crime, and the preface ....... of unlawful, some ofthe Islamic lawyers said that because of the comparison of the rate of crime has beendone and therelevant punishment at the bigining of crime. With the preface of unlawfulthe Religius instead of the bigining of crime is preface of unlawful thus the preface ofunlawful is the same as the bigining of crime. Therefore I believe that with comparingthe essential disscussion of preface of unlawful with bigining the crime, and counting thedifferences points of these matters with the viewpoint of the lawyers the preface ofunlawful with bigining the crime. not only is not compattible but these two disscussionsare completely different and divergent subjects.

Otherwise at the end of this letter, we tried to survey these matters precisely, afterdefinition of the principal legal and Religious subjects after the precise survey andconsidering the joint points and difference points of these. The criteria of these mattersor the Religious instead ....... of them has been introduced. Finally the viewpoint of thefamous lawyers should explain codumently.

 

 Key Words

attempt - propartory act - executive act - aborted offence attempting the impossible -illusory - tajarri - punishment - comparative study

 

Updated  May. 2011

Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran(IR).  P.O.Box: 14655-159. Tel: +98 21 88094001, Fax: +98 21 88093484.  Email: isu@isu.ac.ir

Copyright © Mar 2005 Web Master of ISU