Subject, Plurality of criines in Iranian, Lebnonian
And Frenc;h Criminal It'. LAWs.
Purpose for Rule ofPl1,Jrality crimes is to fix a
suitable Puni~;flffient. First we should examine the aim of lawmaker
from punishments then we should take a step for Exactment of suitable
penalty based on legis latur's targets in every case, especially in
plurality crimes. The criteria of a better principle is to meet the
lowmaker and society demands. This will prove helpful in decreasing the
crimes especially plurality crimes. There are only four in LEBNONIAN and
six articles in French LAW while we examine thirty none organiecl and
disconected articles for plurality crimes in iranian criminal LAW. These
articles basis an jurisprudence and clossic LAW. It is also. Combination
of none academic methods.
All iranian laivgers belive that in case of mixture
pumishes, (which are stmilar or not) suitable Punishment should be
prescribed. But jurisprudants creat difficulties in way of this
solution. In these thesis, we have criticised Jurisprudant's views by
Rotional Principles and Islamic traditions. We have concluded that
execution of this Rule in Discretionary Punishment can be justified
casily. In case of mixture of Prescribed and Discretionary Punishments,
by omission of Discretionary, we can Execute this rule without any
Islamic Prohibition. By comparative study of Lebnonian, IRANIAN and
French LAW, we have discovered that iranian LAW has a LOT of defieinsies
and defects.
In II Chapter, of these theses, we have analysed the
metaphorical plurality crimes in different countries and reasans of
their contradiction.
In III chapter, we have described in detail the
terminology related with this subject, for example eonffict of articles
which errupts from Ambiguity of interpretation and applicability between
Rules of law and human action.
Mohammad Koran;
Plurality of crimes - concours de infraction -
criminal law
